JAYA VERDICT ERROR

JAYA VERDICT ERROR
CLICK here for SC verdict on SASIKALA and others

Thursday 14 May 2015

ERROR at initial amendment












#jayalaithaa
You can check this error even if added more and more non acceptable items of INCOME or ASSET value reduction which mentioned by ADMK lawyers the calculation never go below the permissible limit 10% for this Himalayan error of MATHS on Jaya verdict Instead it has come out somewhere between 17% to 106%. This article clearly explains each and every possibility considering various permutations and combinations of OFFSETTING neutral and reasonable justification the percentage DA value never go below 10%

Read more and get a clear cut picture of GRAVE error of this Hon'ble Justice Kumaarasaamy
#JayaVerdict 
#JayaVerdictWrongCalculation


There are FOUR major errors analysed in this site using simple arithmetic. All comments are welcome. Please click the relevant links right side bar  for elaborate study on the ANALYSIS of errors in JAYA VERDICT.

\

How DA came to account for less than 10% of income

  • Vigilance probe’s findings:
    Construction costs: Rs.27,79,88, 945
    Marriage expenses: Rs.6,25,04,222
  • High Court’s findings: Construction costs: Rs.5,10,54,060 
    Marriage expenses: Rs.28,68,000
  • Exaggerated value:
    Construction costs: Rs.2,69,34,885
    Marriage expenses: Rs.6,16,36,222
  • Total assets:
    Vigilance estimate - Exaggerated value
    Rs. 37,59,02,466
  • Disproportionate assets: Total assets - Total income
  • Rs.37,59,02,466-Rs.34,76,65,654 = Rs.2,82,36,812
  • Rs.2,82,36,812 x 100/Rs.34,76,65,654= 8.12%











5 comments :

Anonymous said...

Looks like master plan from the judge.

1) escape from higher pressures by acquitting JJ and retire peacefully in August.

2) make sure JJ don’t escape by making superb twist in the totaling loan amounts

Anonymous said...

873 பக்கத்தில் நமது எம் ஜி ஆர் க்கு வருமானம் 13,89,19,475.00 கொடுக்கப்பட்டு உள்ளது .இதையும் கணக்கிட்டு உள்ளார் போலும்.

Unknown said...

The case filed by CBI regarding Jayalalitha illegally receiving gifts is pending in the Supreme Court. Declaring Jayalalithaa’s illegal gift receipts as income and legitimizing this at this time would set a wrong precedence. It will create a situation where a minister or government servant can do any amount of corruption and declare assets possessed disproportionate to their income as gifts to escape from conviction. Justice Kumarasamy’s judgement has ignored the direction of the Supreme Court that the judgement should take into account that corruption is the biggest evil in the country. Conversely the verdict given by Justice Kumarasmy appears to encourage corruption.
Justice Kumarasamy had cited the fact that Jayalalitha and her associates had disclosed their assets to the income tax department and the department had accepted their submissions and quoted this as one justification for their acquittal. But the Honourable Judge had overlooked the facts that Jayalalitha filed her tax returns only after the Disproportionate Assets case was filed and that the decisions of the Income Tax department need not be given significance by the courts.

சி.பி.செந்தில்குமார் said...

சூப்பரு

Steve said...

Such Judges would continue their erroneous way to Supreme Court & may end up as CJI too with blessings of Political bigwigs whom they service. People have paid & continue to pay a price for mistake of corrupt Judges. Satyam's Raju had no political backing and continued to rot for 5 years in Jail. Jayalalita was accomodated by special provision to enable her not to go to jail during Diwali.Who will have faith in the Courts?

Post a Comment