#jayalaithaa
You can check this error even if added more and more non acceptable items of INCOME or ASSET value reduction which mentioned by ADMK lawyers the calculation never go below the permissible limit 10% for this Himalayan error of MATHS on Jaya verdict Instead it has come out somewhere between 17% to 106%. This article clearly explains each and every possibility considering various permutations and combinations of OFFSETTING neutral and reasonable justification the percentage DA value never go below 10%
Read more and get a clear cut picture of GRAVE error of this Hon'ble Justice Kumaarasaamy|
#JayaVerdict
#JayaVerdictWrongCalculation
There are FOUR major errors analysed in this site using simple arithmetic. All comments are welcome. Please click the relevant links right side bar for elaborate study on the ANALYSIS of errors in JAYA VERDICT.
\
- FOUR ERRORS OF KUMARASAAMY VERDICT [LOGIC ERROR No.1.]
- LOGIC ERROR NO.2
- ARITHMETIC ERROR NO.1
- ARITHMETIC ERROR No.2
How DA came to account for less than 10% of income
- Vigilance probe’s findings:
Construction costs: Rs.27,79,88, 945
Marriage expenses: Rs.6,25,04,222 - High Court’s findings: Construction costs: Rs.5,10,54,060
Marriage expenses: Rs.28,68,000 - Exaggerated value:
Construction costs: Rs.2,69,34,885
Marriage expenses: Rs.6,16,36,222 - Total assets:
Vigilance estimate - Exaggerated value
Rs. 37,59,02,466 - Disproportionate assets: Total assets - Total income
- Rs.37,59,02,466-Rs.34,76,65,654 = Rs.2,82,36,812
- Rs.2,82,36,812 x 100/Rs.34,76,65,654= 8.12%
This is one of the TOP 5 in most flawed verdicts in Independent India as per following report click here
